SADC slams US tariffs, contradicting Mnangagwa’s unilateral approach

Must Try

Trending

HARARE – The Southern African Development Community (SADC) has publicly voiced its “profound concern” regarding the United States’ imposition of new import tariffs, directly contradicting a recent unilateral decision by its current chair, Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa.

The US, last week, announced a 10% baseline tariff on all imports, effective April 5, 2025, followed by “reciprocal” tariffs on specific SADC member states, taking effect on April 9, 2025.

These reciprocal tariffs, ranging from 10% to 50%, significantly impact key export sectors like textiles and clothing, effectively nullifying the benefits of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) for most SADC members.

SADC highlighted the disproportionate impact on member states, with Lesotho facing a 50% tariff and Madagascar a 47% tariff. Other member states like Malawi, Zambia, and Zimbabwe also face significant tariffs, while Seychelles is exempt.

The announcement underscores the SADC’s commitment to multilateral trade rules and fair competition under the World Trade Organization (WTO).

This collective stance directly clashes with Mnangagwa’s earlier announcement of suspending tariffs on US imports into Zimbabwe. This move, he claimed, was aimed at promoting Zimbabwean exports to the US, despite the US imposing an 18% tariff on Zimbabwean goods.

“This measure is intended to facilitate the expansion of American imports within the Zimbabwean market, while simultaneously promoting the growth of Zimbabwean exports destined for the United States,” Mnangagwa stated in a statement posted on his X handle.

The SADC’s response reveals a clear divergence in approach between the regional body and its chair. While Mnangagwa seeks a bilateral solution with the US, the SADC is pursuing a unified regional response.

Former Finance Minister Tendai Biti warned that Mnangagwa’s move was “a huge betrayal.”

“The response to US imposed tariffs or any other external threat to the region can’t be unilateral opportunistic and I’ll thought.

“Zimbabwe particularly in its capacity as SADC chair had a duty of leading a regional response anchored on values, research pan African interest,” Biti stated.

“The region has solidly stood with the regime in Harare for years and the same owes a duty of care to the region.

“The region faces serious geopolitical threats including the war in the DRC and the threat of global war. Unilateralism is myopic selfish and suicidal. It is a huge betrayal.”

The SADC Secretariat has initiated a detailed assessment of the US measures’ impact on regional trade, with findings to be reviewed by ministerial committees in June and August 2025. This assessment will inform a collective response from SADC member states.

“SADC reiterates its commitment to further the objectives of the SADC Treaty through continued adherence to multilateral trade rules and fair competition administered by the World Trade Organization (WTO) and remains open to engagement with stakeholders on these matters,” the regional body stated.

The trade between the US and Zimbabwe is relatively small, totaling US$111.6 million in 2024, with US exports to Zimbabwe at US$43.8 million and imports at US$67.8 million.

Related Articles

Former First Lady Grace Mugabe and President Emmerson Mnangagwa, March 2026 (Picture via Ministry of Information)

The uneasy peace: Grace Mugabe, Mnangagwa and the politics of controlled memory

0
At a recent public function, the opening of The Sprout Restaurant in Harare, we saw former First Lady Grace Mugabe moving within the same orbit as senior ZANU PF figures, her presence neither resisted nor theatrically embraced.
Vice President Constantino Chiwenga and President Emmerson Mnangagwa during a Zanu PF Central Committee meeting (Picture via X - @SokoCindy - Zanu PF Celebs)

Who will drive the bus: Mamvura, General Chiwenga, or someone else? Will President Mnangagwa...

0
In this second and final part of the article, I continue to examine the potential outcomes of ZANU-PF’s succession politics, focusing on whether Kudakwashe Tagwirei (whom I metaphorically refer to as “Mamvura”) will succeed in his presumed bid for the presidency, whether General Constantino Chiwenga will recover his political standing and take over, whether someone else will ascend to the throne, and whether President Mnangagwa will ultimately retire in peace.
President Emmerson Mnangagwa officially opening the 22nd ZANU PF National People’s Conference in Mutare, 17 October 2025 (Picture via X - @edmnangagwa)

How can people who rejected a president in two elections now want him to...

0
The political narrative currently being spun by loyalists of President Emmerson Mnangagwa is as audacious as it is intellectually dishonest.
Moses Tofa is a Research Leader, political analyst, and self-critical Pan-Africanist. He holds a PhD in Politics from the University of Johannesburg and a PhD in Conflict Studies from the University of KwaZulu Natal. (Picture via Facebook - Moses Tofa)

Who will drive the bus: Mamvura or General Chiwenga? Will President Mnangagwa retire peacefully?...

0
Zimbabwe is at a crossroads where critical and cruel decisions are being made in the corridors of power. These decisions will determine the country’s direction for many years to come.
Chatunga Mugabe (28) and his co-accused, Tobias Mugabe Matonhodze (33), appeared before the Alexandra Magistrate’s Court in Johannesburg (Picture via SABC News)

Trauma, power and the unfinished healing of Zimbabwe: The case study of Mugabe and...

0
Zimbabwe’s modern political history is often narrated through elections, constitutional changes, economic collapse, land reform, sanctions, liberation-war heroism, tribalism, authoritarian rule and the emerging culture of a cargo cult.

Don't miss a story

Breaking News straight to your inbox.

No spam just news !

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Donate to Nehanda Radio

Latest Recipes

Latest

More Recipes Like This