spot_img

Nothing fair or impartial about the Land Compensation Fund

Must Try

Trending

Nehanda Radio
Zimbabwe News and Internet Radio

By Cathy Buckle

Driving past the big Acacia trees where the vervet monkeys always used to play, I feel the knot in my stomach tightening. It’s a beautiful day: warm blue sky, pink and white Cosmos flowers along the roadsides and the grass is tall and golden but already I don’t want to see what I know I’m going to see.

- Advertisement -
Cathy Buckle
Cathy Buckle

I’m going to drive past my farm; the farm that was seized by the Zimbabwe government sixteen years ago and for which not a single dollar of compensation has yet been paid.

The reason for my drive-by of our farm this week was to see the state of our seized property because the Zimbabwe government have just announced the establishment of a Land Compensation Fund.

According to the memorandum presented to members of Parliament, the purpose of the Land Compensation Fund is to: “provide resources for the payment of compensation to former farm owners whose farms were acquired by the State under the Land Reform Programme and to enhance productivity on allocated land.”

- Advertisement -

Despite sensational international media headlines you need to read the document carefully!

Expenditure from the fund is to pay compensation for land and improvements to indigenous  farmers and those with foreign investment agreements (BIPPAS); to pay for  improvements only in the case of all  other dispossessed farmers and to pay for farm equipment that was seized.

Expenditure from the Fund is also specified as being for the Ministry of Lands to carry out farm inspections, undertake valuations and for various other administrative and operational costs (including the never ending computers, vehicles and other items). The Land Compensation Fund will also be used to assist beneficiaries of seized land to “enhance productivity.”

Income for the Fund is apparently going to come from rentals and leases paid by the new occupants of seized farms as well as from ‘development partners’ and donors.

The new Land Compensation Fund all sounds very grand, but wait, look a bit closer. We are a country that is completely broke and has just declared a national disaster, appealing to the world for one a half billion US dollars of emergency food aid and other assistance.

For the last fifteen years the 200,000 plus beneficiaries of seized land have turned us into a  food insecure country; leaving us nett importers of 80% of our food. These same 200,000 plus people aren’t even able to provide their own seed and fertilizer to grow their crops, continually needing inputs from the government.

How then will these same people be able to pay the rents and leases which are apparently to provide the income stream into the Land Compensation Fund? Then there’s the peculiar contradiction in the Compensation document because the same people paying rents and levies into the Land Compensation Fund are apparently also going to get assistance out of the Fund to ‘enhance productivity.’

Doesn’t one cancel out the other? Who, we wonder will get first dibs on any money that comes into the Fund: the dispossessed farmers who’ve been waiting 16 years or the beneficiaries of the seized farms to enhance their productivity?

For a Zimbabwean born but non-indigenous farmer like me I have to pin all my hopes on the ‘improvements’ on my seized farm because I am apparently not entitled to be compensated for the land itself because of my skin colour; this despite the fact that the farm was purchased ten years after Independence with the approval of the Zimbabwe government.

But I’m worried, very worried, because according to the Land Compensation Fund memo to Parliament it is the same Zanu PF government who seized our farms 16 years ago who are now going to value our farms and the improvements on them. By any stretch of the imagination how can that be considered to be fair and impartial? Why would any ‘development partner’ or donor agree to that?

And so, with all this swirling in my mind I went to have a look at the state of the ‘improvements’ on the farm that was seized from us back in 2000. I can only look from the road; the grass is tall and I can only see a fraction of the improvements that were left on the farm sixteen years ago.

I can see that houses have been demolished; I can see that infrastructure has gone: I can see four kilometers of boundary fencing along the main roads has gone; I can see the roof, doors and fencing around the tobacco barns are gone; I can see water storage tanks have gone. What else lies beyond the tall grass? I can hardly bear to think of it and am overcome by sadness. Why such destruction?

What will the government valuators find? What is left for them to value sixteen years later? More to the point, unless this whole issue is handled by a completely independent, impartial body how will it ever put an end to the mayhem on the land that continues to cripple our country, drive away investors and leave us importing 80% of our food.

For all the new political parties sprouting like mushrooms in a dark shed, now’s your chance to speak out and insist this is sorted out properly for the future of all Zimbabweans.

Until next time, thanks for reading, love cathy 

Related Articles

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (Picture via YouTube - United States Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit)

US court orders Zimbabwe to pay US$440m over Mugabe-era land seizures

1
Zimbabwe has been ordered by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to pay approximately US$440 million to a Swiss-German family and two forestry companies due to a long-standing land dispute.
President Emmerson Mnangagwa seen here with Finance Minister Mthuli Ncube attended the 2024 National Budget Presentation at the New Parliament Building, Mt Hampden. (Picture via Ministry of Information, Publicity and Broadcasting Services)

Zimbabwe unveils US$20m plan to compensate white farmers this year

0
The Zimbabwean government has announced plans to compensate former farm owners affected by the Land Reform Programme, allocating US$20 million towards reimbursement of foreign farmers.
Defence Minister Oppah Muchinguri Kashiri (Picture via X - Ministry of Information)

Zimbabwe move to unlock land wealth will favour multiple farm owners

0
The Zimbabwean government has announced a significant shift in its land policy, allowing beneficiaries of its land reform exercise to sell or transfer their farms, but only to indigenous Zimbabweans. This move is likely to benefit those who acquired multiple farms during the land reform program, which was launched in 2000 and saw large tracts of land seized from white owners and redistributed to black Zimbabweans.
Chipinge South legislator Clifford Hlatywayo in the New Parliament building (Picture via X - @CliffordHlatyw1)

Zulu land trust model ignites hope for Zimbabwe’s rural development

0
HARARE - The Zimbabwean Parliament erupted in an emotive debate last week over a motion to provide security of tenure for occupants of communal lands. The proposal, led by the leader of the opposition, Clifford Hlatywayo, sparked discussions on how to empower rural communities and unlock the economic potential of these areas, with lawmakers drawing inspiration from successful models in neighboring South Africa.

MDC accuses Zanu PF of being “sellouts” for reversing land reform

0
Former Finance minister Tendai Biti and Norton legislator Temba Mliswa have told President Emmerson Mnangagwa to amend the constitution for his administration to be able to seize idle land from black people for redistribution to white Zimbabweans.

Don't miss a story

Breaking News straight to your inbox.

No spam just news !

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Latest Recipes

Latest

More Recipes Like This