spot_img

How can people who rejected a president in two elections now want him to extend his term?

"We are told that “the people” are so enamored with the President’s performance and his “national development” agenda that they are practically begging for a constitutional amendment to extend his time in office."

Must Try

Trending

There are stories that can be believed, and there are those that even five-year-olds know to be fairy tales.

The political narrative currently being spun by loyalists of President Emmerson Mnangagwa is as audacious as it is intellectually dishonest.

We are told that “the people” are so enamored with the President’s performance and his “national development” agenda that they are practically begging for a constitutional amendment to extend his time in office.

This supposed groundswell of public pressure has culminated in the so-called “Resolution No. 1” and the subsequent Constitutional Amendment (No. 3) Bill, which seeks to push his tenure beyond the current 2028 deadline.

But if we move past the choreographed chants and the state-sponsored sycophancy, a glaring question remains.

At what point exactly did the people of Zimbabwe, who have twice rejected this president at the ballot box, suddenly decide they cannot live without him?

Numbers do not lie, and in the case of the 2018 and 2023 harmonized elections, the raw popular vote numbers tell a story of profound rejection.

It is crucial to look at these specific figures rather than obscured percentages or seat counts.

In 2018, according to official ZEC data, ZANU PF Members of Parliament secured a commanding victory, yet Mnangagwa himself lagged significantly behind the party’s collective performance.

While ZANU PF candidates for the National Assembly secured a convincing majority with a massive popular vote, Mnangagwa narrowly avoided a run-off with 2,461,745 votes.

In comparison, the total votes cast for ZANU PF MPs across the country reached approximately 2,477,708, meaning tens of thousands of ZANU PF supporters chose their local MP but explicitly refused to endorse the man at the top.

Fast forward to 2023, and the trend solidified into a permanent feature of our political landscape.

Despite the intense “ED Pfee” campaigning, the President once again trailed behind his own party.

In the 2023 harmonized elections, Mnangagwa officially received 2,350,711 votes.

However, the collective vote for ZANU PF parliamentary candidates was notably higher, with the party pulling approximately 2,501,475 votes in the National Assembly race.

This means that even after five years in power, over 160,000 people who voted for ZANU PF candidates for Parliament pointedly refused to tick the box for the presidential candidate.

This “split-voting” phenomenon is not a statistical fluke; it is a deliberate political statement repeated across two consecutive elections.

This data is the most authentic set we have on public sentiment.

It proves that even within the ruling party’s own support base, there is a significant portion of the electorate that trusts the party’s local representatives but fundamentally distrusts the man at the top.

How can a president who repeatedly receives far fewer votes than his own party’s MPs be said to be “doing a good job”?

If “the people” were truly clamoring for him to “finish his programs,” surely that enthusiasm would have reflected in a popular vote that at least matched, if not exceeded, that of his subordinates.

Instead, the opposite is true.

The people of Zimbabwe loudly and audibly spoke twice on how they truly felt about the president, and the verdict was far from flattering.

When ZANU PF MPs were awarded convincing victories, the president barely scraped through.

That should be clear enough evidence of what the public genuinely feels.

The claim by loyalists that the push for a term extension is “from the people” is a fallacy of the highest order.

It suggests a magical, overnight conversion of the Zimbabwean soul.

We are expected to believe that the same citizens who walked into polling booths in August 2023 and rejected Mnangagwa have now, less than three years later, decided that the supreme law of the land—a sacred document they voted for in 2013—should be mutilated just to keep him in power.

Isn’t it quite curious that the same people who twice rejected the president now allegedly want him to stay in power longer?

At what point did these “people” decide that they not only wanted him as president but actually wanted the supreme law changed to facilitate his continued stay?

This is not public pressure; it is elite persistence.

It is the work of a few who mistake their own proximity to power for the will of the nation.

If those pushing for these constitutional amendments truly believe “the people” have changed their minds, then they should ask the people again in a national referendum.

This would not be a favor or an act of benevolence from the state; it is something the Constitution itself demands.

The Constitution is particularly clear when the effect of an amendment extends the length of time that a person may hold or occupy any public office.

Such an amendment should not benefit any person who held or occupied that office at any time before the amendment.

The only legal and democratic way this can be changed is through a national referendum.

If the proponents of this amendment are so confident that the public is behind them, why are they not rushing toward a referendum to validate their claims?

The reality is that any claims that “the people” are the ones who want the president to continue in office are unfounded and without merit.

The track record of the last two elections serves as a standing rebuttal to the “Resolution No. 1” narrative.

You cannot claim to lead by the will of the people while simultaneously avoiding the very mechanism—the direct popular vote—that allows them to choose their leader.

The people have already spoken, and they did not ask for him to remain.

If the loyalists truly believe they have the mandate of the masses, give the people a national referendum to prove me wrong.

Until then, these constitutional maneuvers remain an affront to the democratic will of Zimbabwe.

● Tendai Ruben Mbofana is a social justice advocate and writer. To directly receive his articles please join his WhatsApp Channel on: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaqprWCIyPtRnKpkHe08

If you value my social justice advocacy and writing, please consider a financial contribution to keep it going. Contact me on WhatsApp: +263 715 667 700 or Email: [email protected]

Related Articles

Former First Lady Grace Mugabe and President Emmerson Mnangagwa, March 2026 (Picture via Ministry of Information)

The uneasy peace: Grace Mugabe, Mnangagwa and the politics of controlled memory

0
At a recent public function, the opening of The Sprout Restaurant in Harare, we saw former First Lady Grace Mugabe moving within the same orbit as senior ZANU PF figures, her presence neither resisted nor theatrically embraced.
Vice President Constantino Chiwenga and President Emmerson Mnangagwa during a Zanu PF Central Committee meeting (Picture via X - @SokoCindy - Zanu PF Celebs)

Who will drive the bus: Mamvura, General Chiwenga, or someone else? Will President Mnangagwa...

0
In this second and final part of the article, I continue to examine the potential outcomes of ZANU-PF’s succession politics, focusing on whether Kudakwashe Tagwirei (whom I metaphorically refer to as “Mamvura”) will succeed in his presumed bid for the presidency, whether General Constantino Chiwenga will recover his political standing and take over, whether someone else will ascend to the throne, and whether President Mnangagwa will ultimately retire in peace.
Paul Tungwarara and his daughter Tinotenda Tungwarara (Pictures via X - @PresFunds and Instagram - Tino Tungwarara)

Paul Tungwarara, be careful you don’t create another “Mugabe-boys” out of your daughter

0
At the center of this modern display is the daughter of tenderpreneur Paul Tungwarara, whose digital footprint is increasingly defined by the kind of unashamed flaunting of wealth that leaves a bitter taste in the mouths of a struggling populace.
Moses Tofa is a Research Leader, political analyst, and self-critical Pan-Africanist. He holds a PhD in Politics from the University of Johannesburg and a PhD in Conflict Studies from the University of KwaZulu Natal. (Picture via Facebook - Moses Tofa)

Who will drive the bus: Mamvura or General Chiwenga? Will President Mnangagwa retire peacefully?...

0
Zimbabwe is at a crossroads where critical and cruel decisions are being made in the corridors of power. These decisions will determine the country’s direction for many years to come.
First Lady Auxillia Mnangagwa visited Chikurubi Maximum Security Prison where she met convicted killer Anymore Zvitsva (Picture via X - First Lady of Zimbabwe)

How televising Anymore Zvitsva’s confessions risks creating a ‘Ted Bundy’ cult in Zimbabwe

0
The spectacle of the First Lady entering the grim confines of Chikurubi Maximum Security Prison to sit face to face with Anymore Zvitsva is a moment that should give every Zimbabwean pause.

Don't miss a story

Breaking News straight to your inbox.

No spam just news !

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Latest Recipes

Latest

More Recipes Like This