fbpx
Zimbabwe News and Internet Radio

South African DJ Euphonik impregnates mistress, awaits baby number 8

South African DJ and music producer Euphonik’s battle for custody with his ex-wife has opened a can of worms, after she recently revealed in court that the house music maestro is expecting his eighth child after impregnating one of his mistresses.

Euphonik and his estranged wife are currently battling for the custody of their two children after the collapse of their polygamous marriage.

In a supplementary affidavit reportedly filed two weeks ago, the musician’s ex claimed that their children did not get enough attention when they went to visit him at his where his first wife, Kholeka Qiniso, resides.

“When the children are at the respondent’s home, they are not very often in his company and are often cared for by a relative of Kholeka, Dineo, whom the respondent has brought into his home to assist with childcare.

“There is no reason for my children to be in the care of Dineo when they can be with me. 

Related Articles
1 of 2

“There are in total seven children in the respondent’s home, being our two who are the subject hereof, the three whom he had with Kholeka who are mentioned in earlier papers, a baby born to Kholeka in January 2024, and Dineo’s under-two-year-old child,” the affidavit stated.

It was also revealed that Euphonik was expecting another child, after impregnating another one of his mistresses.

“It is self-evident that my two do not get the one-on-one hands-on attention that they receive when with me, and they have to share all resources between the seven of them.  

“The respondent’s girlfriend has just had her baby shower, and there will soon be an eighth baby in the picture,” she stated in the affidavit. 

She also stated that Euphonik does not want her children to bring to his home the iPads that her grandparents bought for them.  

“The respondent does not want them to have them, and thus the children do not even take them into the respondent’s home, and when the children are with me, although I have asked the respondent to use their iPads on which to call them, he refuses.

“His attitude is that I am attempting to emasculate him by allowing my grandparents to buy such gifts for ‘his’ children,” read the affidavit. 

Comments