By Gilbert Muponda
Media reports (in particular Newsday) on the fall of Interfin Bank cannot go unchallenged as they seek to divert attention from the systematic looting spree at the Bank and try to apportion some blame elsewhere.
According to the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe, (http://www.rbz.co.zw/pdfs/BLSS/Guidelines/Interfin.PDF) Interfin Bank was closed due excessive non performing insider loans which was clearly a disguised scheme to siphon depositor’s funds leaving the Bank a bleeding shell.
Shareholders and Directors were awarding themselves massive loans which were not properly approved or secured and failure to repay these loans is what brought down the Bank. Bank Management ignored prudential lending guidelines and international best practice and transformed the Bank into a family piggy bank by certain egoistic shareholders.
According to the RBZ investigation on Interfin, The bank was also found to have violated several banking laws.
“…the unsafe condition of Interfin Bank Limited is attributable to inadequate capitalisation, concentrated shareholding and abuse of corporate structures, high level of non-performing insider and related party exposures, chronic liquidity and income generation challenges,” the central bank report revealed.
It is important to note that Interfin Bank, its shareholders and management have not denied or challenged these findings.
The dispute between me and Interfin is well documented as letters of November 2, 2009, August 27, 2009 and September 27, 2010 and July 7 2011 sent directly to Interfin Bank Directors and Shareholders show.
This dispute is centred on Century Bank assets which were taken over and rebranded to CFX Bank, CFX Bank assets were then taken over and rebranded as Interfin Banking Corporation. These were illegal, sinister, dubious and fraudulent schemes meant to conceal the illegal takeover of CFX/Century Bank from me.
I have challenged this process from day one and my lawyers have written to Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe, Registrar of Banks, Zimbabwe Stock Exchange, Securities and Exchange Commission and Interfin Bank Curator stating my position that I expect compensation or my Bank to be returned to me in the same way that Trust, Barbican, Royal and Time Bank were returned to their owners.
The fall of Interfin Bank is not in my interest especially before they pay me the $15.4 million or return of my assets. Interfin violated the law during the takeover of my Bank. Under the Banking Act it is illegal to buy or capitalize a bank using borrowed funds.
Interfin did exactly that by borrowing money from a money lender and used the money to buy the Bank whilst securing the loan with the Bank’s shares. In addition this violates the Company Act. This is partly the reason why I have been insisting that Interfin illegally and irregularly took my bank hence my demand of return of the Bank.
On June 10 2011 I issued an accurate and precise Cautionary statement on Interfin Bank. My “Return Muponda’s Bank” campaign is legal and justified. It’s a legitimate campaign backed by 3 legal firms on 3 continents given the circumstances. The campaign was validated after I presented my claim to Credit Suisse and Finance Bank of Zambia who were trying to take over the Bank.
They did their own back ground check and due diligence and were convinced by the seriousness of my claim and they duly pulled out of the deal, then Interfin unwisely decided to grab my assets without paying me compensation resulting in the current dispute.
Whilst the campaign is currently suspended I reserve the exclusive right to resume it should the Curatorship period at Interfin fail to take my interests into consideration.
Interfin bank took over the assets and liabilities of my Bank ,Century / CFX Bank. Interfin proceeded to acquire a controlling stake in CFX Financial Services Limited well aware of my contention that the latter illegally, unlawfully and irregularly acquired my 309 million shares in Century Bank as evidenced by High Court Case HC 624404.
Interfin are the main beneficiaries of the irregular and unlawful disposal of the shares. It has therefore been unjustly enriched whilst I was correspondingly impoverished. Hence my demand that Interfin bank compensates me to the tune of USD15.4 million being 309 million shares multiplied by USD0.05. As already stated, Interfin assumed all the assets and liabilities of CFX Bank and Century Bank.
Further and as already stated, Interfin was fully aware of my equity claim against CFX Bank before it concluded the transaction. I was then specified and could not protect this interest. My lawyers also wrote to the Minister of Finance and Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe to place my position on record.
I was specified on May 28, 2004. I was de-specified on April 29, 2011. I am entitled to a return of my assets in this case the 309 million Century Bank Shares. I have repeatedly demonstrated that the shares and the Bank were unlawfully and irregularly sold in the first place, and Interfin Bank was made aware of my equity claim.
Interfin was well aware that they were violating the Prevention of Corruption Act when they were buying ,trading and rebranding my assets since the Act prohibits the buying ,selling or trading of assets of a specified person.
The only reason why we have not filed a new court motion was after strong persuasions to avoid the court process as it may disturb a fragile Banking sector. This moral suasion which is normal in Banking but in no way does it reduce my rights on my claim for compensation of $ 15.4 million or return of the Bank.
I am hoping Interfin quickly gets back to its feet and I can get my dues from the Bank and its shareholders.
I hope this adds some clarity to the matter.
To help maintain editorial independence Nehanda Radio relies on donations from readers like you. No donation is too small or too big. Help by donating to fund our operations.